I do agree that the migration to Python 3 was completely mishandled. They're a Django shop and all of their sites are top notch. Its large and robust standard library makes Python score over other … I like languages that make use of parentheses and braces and that sort of thing. 's "comfort zone" post? Embedded snippets seems like a pretty limited use case. For some things, it's my goto. There are mostly 2 things I don't like about python. Let’s compare the usability and design of some different Python and Ruby sites. If nobody complains about your language, nobody uses it. Python is not bound up with a large amount of written code, which is why it allows developers to work faster. As someone who has evaluated Ruby on Rails and is now learning Python and considering it and Django for use on a new project, I completely agree with this article. I can only imagine that it's the demographics of who learns the languages. Programs that would be simple in Ruby (and even simpler in Lisp) turn into mangled nests of for loops in the blink of an eye, because in Python absolutely EVERYTHING has to be written out by hand as for loops. http://www.ruby-doc.org/stdlib-1.9.3/
In python, your best bet is to keeps things simple and concise. Django Forms: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/forms/?from=olddocs
As Jess and I discussed above, the lack of better design does have an impact on the overall perception of the community, and this is unfortunate. As you've pointed out, strong typing removes that ambiguity, leading to clearer code. Actually I've seen that Oxford starts with Haskell, which I think is pretty unique. If that is so important, then how is python so successful? There are, however, ways of optimising your Python applications by leveraging async, understanding the profiling tools, and consider using multiple-interpreters. Second, there is no basic theory or set of equations to tell you if a given design will result in a software that is successful in the sense that it can be delivered on time and maintained with a reasonable level of effort by a team of humans. Whereas many other languages are redundant in that respect, which does not respect the DRY principle. It was early 1997, and Mark Lutz's book Programming Python from O'Reilly & Associates had recently come out. As a dynamically typed language, Python is slow because it is too flexible and the machine would need to do a lot of referencing to make sure what the definition of something is, and this slows Python performance down. I came upon this quote a few years ago, and this is my absolute favorite in the programming world. Any attempt of using it to something bigger than that, was met with NO redeeming qualities once or ever. I would argue that software engineering does not have, and may not ever have, some sort of equivalent set of laws to tell you how successful a project will really be. The third digit in the version number changes, and the code stops working? Rails FormHelper: http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/FormHelper.html
But what about python? I rather prefer a simple factory that produces fast cars over a fancy factory that produces slow cars. vs.
Electrical engineers can use Maxwell's Equations and derived formulas to state clearly and definitively if a given design will generally work. Ruby is a good reference point since it occupies a similar niche in the programming language ecosystem and is roughly the same age. Atleast treating white space (indent) as a language structure always seems to me odd. Java is no stranger to dependency hell either, particularly in the world of EE. The model is that you have source code which you process to create something that you run. I’m currently looking for new ways to hone my full-stack development chops. Builder 02-06-2015 08:57 AM. So, you ask, how can I hate Python if I don't know how to write a single line of it? I feel like I have to know how the missing parts work, and maybe improve them. http://guides.rubyonrails.org/form_helpers.html, Scientifically Proven Tips For A More Productive Office. Finally, we all know that backend and front are fully decoupled, so I'd say statistically it's just as likely to find an ugly front, covering up a pretty back, as it is to find the opposite. Decorators like @staticmethod are used to retrofit common language features. It doesn’t matter. Both are well organized, but it is obvious at a glance who places importance on professional design and who doesn’t. I remember when I was learning Java that I had to use upcasting (some of the nio apis, etc). However python is much older and has a different origin. I think you may be right that some schools start out with Python because it's trendy, but perhaps there's a reason for that trendiness. It doesn't make the code magically better. Weak typing might lead to more instantly gratifying accomplishments in the beginning, but as the beginner's software grows into something more complex, already established bad type-ing habits lead to some of the more difficult to debug errors rooted in the subtleties of weak typing. Works. All this is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to how much I don't like python's syntax.
Python allows you to chain the comparison operations. However, I find that I agree with much of the criticisms of python. It's gibberish. For the rest, I code an extension in the appropriate language for the task and call it from python :). I really do. "Another problem is that should I create a Python project and want to release it on production, I need to NOT ONLY install Python, but pip with every dependency as well, at a global scope. I've noticed this too. Templates let you quickly answer FAQs or store snippets for re-use. If I were going to complain about syntax, I'd start with meaningful white space, which I'm generally opposed to. So the "design" or "front end", not the programming interface. The brackets scream COMPUTER_PROGRAM so when confronted with that a lot of people will panic and then say they have no idea what it does. RoR webdesigners have a lot less to learn before laying their code. But I'd take C/C++ any time over python if at all possible. Recently I've been pushed into Python development because the rest of my team adopted it because of a single library that is marginally better than what we had in Ruby. DEV Community – A constructive and inclusive social network for software developers. I also hate it because of the "indent" design, to delimit a set of instructions using something invisible is simply wrong, it didn't bother me much but being so popular it affected many things along the way (IDE, tabs vs spaces war) even new language design specs, snippet from Go's. This helps … Thus, Python's developers would have to spend, not waste, more time to program what Rails provide and what Python lacks. To play with ML algorithms I had to learn a bit of Python. In python a[1:3] means: give me the element 1 and 2. Is there an equivalent for Ruby documentation? I work at place where people use Python only because they needed to get things done QUICK. Its a very real possibility that usability or design issues on the front page will negatively affect Python adoption. I’m not really sure which is the case. I like Java! Saying that, I know that it is possible to access, understand, clean and prepare data with GUI based tools like Rapid Miner, Alteryx, SAS EM and such. J2EE can have more of a problem with global system libraries (remember log4j vs. commons logging in Tomcat?) Refactoring is a nightmare. by Jess Johnson in That said, if your team's testing, craft, and review discipline are solid, Python is just fine for projects large and small. In one project I found over 3000 lines of code specifically dedicated to completely unnecessary encapsulation of ordinary attributes. In fact, it is rare that I speak of the language without the F-word---usually in ALL CAPS---as a prefix. The back end, regardless of language, takes input, process that input and/or retrieves data, and pushes it back to the front end via a template of one form or another. Either Pythonistas aren’t pairing with designers as often as Rubyists, Pythonistas have less design talent, or Pythonistas simply don’t care enough about design to spend the time to do it right. On the other hand, RoR's website makes you feel excited...
For a web site, caching, CDNs, and concurrent processing will take you much further than your language choice will (within reason: don't write your web site using DOS batch, please). In my mind it strikes the right balance between beauty and pragmatism, and between performance and usability. Heh. Due to its meteoric rise in popularity, Python has good online support at … http://instagr.am/